October 15, 2020
4 Minute Read

The Creosote Ban in Europe: What You Need to Know

As regulations surrounding wood preservatives such as Creosote tighten, and environmental standards evolve, incorporating innovative products such as the Polesaver Rot-Guard™ into utility infrastructure offers a practical path forward, ensuring compliance and sustainability

The Creosote Ban In Europe

Creosote has long been the gold standard for wood preservation, delivering an impressive lifespan of 40 years or more for utility poles. However, its future in Europe is increasingly uncertain. The creosote ban is imminent as the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has classified creosote as a Category B carcinogen and a persistent, bioaccumulate and toxic substance. This classification has led to stricter regulations and a longer term ban across various applications. In response to these concerns, many European countries have already banned the use of creosote.

Exploring Alternatives to Creosote

With the creosote ban on the horizon, utility companies are seeking creosote alternatives. Options like steel, composite and concrete poles are gaining attention but come with challenges:

  • Steel poles can be problematic due to their conductivity and difficulty in climbing.
  • Composite poles offer durability and low maintenance but can be costly and lack the environmental benefits of wood, which acts as a carbon sink.
  • Concrete poles are heavy and contribute to high CO2 emissions during manufacturing—up to 1.46 tonnes per pole.

In response to the limitations of water-based copper preservatives introduced in the EU since 2005 -which faced early failures due to ground-line decay – new formulations have emerged. Enhanced copper-based preservatives now include advanced co-biocides to address issues with copper-tolerant fungi. Although these advanced treatments extend pole life, industry feedback indicates they still fall short of the longevity offered by creosote.

A recent development in creosote alternatives is the use of copper in oil preservatives. These combine copper with water-repellent oils like A.W.P.A. P9a or tall oil, aiming to extend pole life beyond what water-based copper treatments offer by reducing moisture ingress and preservative loss. However, there is currently limited field test data to confirm the long-term effectiveness of these new treatments in real life use conditions.

Barrier Protection Products: A Solution for Ground-Line Decay

Ground line decay over time is the normal mode of utility pole failure. To address this issue the use of ground-line decay, barrier protection products are becoming increasingly relevant. These fall into two categories: partial and full barriers.

Partial Barriers

These sleeves do not fully seal the wood behind them, leading to potential “wet band decay” where moisture moves up from the ground, creating a damp zone at the top of the sleeve where decay can occur.

Full Barriers

Products like Polesaver Rot-Guard offer a total seal, effectively eliminating the factors necessary for wood decay. By lowering the entry point for moisture, total barrier sleeves limit moisture ingress and loss of wood preservative due to leaching and oxidation.

Full Barrier Sleeves Ensure Prolonged Protection

Independent field tests conducted show that full barrier sleeves are 100% effective at preventing decay after 20 years, reinforcing the plus 20 year increase in pole life achievable with total ground line barrier sleeves. This data serves to reinforce the excellent results seen to date with over 7 million sleeves in service.

Testing across various sites has demonstrated that full barrier sleeves are highly effective in controlling wood moisture content compared to traditional treatments. Specifically, full barrier sleeves help maintain an average moisture content of below 20%, the threshold where wood rot can start at the ground line/top of sleeve, this is significantly lower than the moisture content in other treated poles. By keeping moisture levels at, or below, this critical threshold, full barrier sleeves help prevent the onset of wood rot and extend the lifespan of wooden utility poles.

Conclusion: A Proven Alternative to Creosote

For utility companies facing the creosote ban, Polesaver Rot-Guard presents a cost-effective and sustainable alternative. When combined with water-based or copper-in-oil preservatives, Polesaver sleeves extend the expected service life of utility poles to 40 years or more, matching the longevity of traditional creosote treatments. This makes them a robust, environmentally friendly solution in the evolving landscape of wood preservation. As regulations tighten and environmental standards evolve, incorporating these innovative products into utility infrastructure offers a practical path forward, ensuring compliance and sustainability.

Get in Touch

Polesaver is the leading manufacturer of products proven to extend the life of wooden utility poles, and has been working with utility companies globally for 30 years. Get in touch for more information or to arrange a TEAMS call with one of our specialists.

LEARN MORE

TOTAL POLE PROTECTION

From durable fire fabric, to outstanding protection against rot and termites, Polesaver products are tested and trusted to deliver unbeatable pole protection.
Share

FEATURED Articles

Featured
May 16, 2022

What Are The Alternatives To Penta wood Preservative?

In this short article, we run through the alternatives to Pentachlorophenol wood preservative and how you can use them in conjunction with a full barrier system to prevent decay and increase pole life by +20 years from the start.
Image showing core rot in a wooden utility pole
Featured
October 15, 2019

Utility Pole Core Rot: Causes and Prevention

Core rot is the decay of the strongest part of a wooden utility pole, the core. It typically accounts for around 60 to 70% of wooden pole failures and can occur at any time during in the utility poles life. Core rot normally occurs due to air or insect-borne brown rot fungal spores entering the unprotected core of the pole through cracks
Utility Pole Materials: Which Is Best? - Hero Image of utility pole stood up in a field
Featured
July 9, 2019

Utility Pole Materials: Which Is the Best Choice for Longevity and Sustainability?

The choice of which utility pole to use depends on balancing cost, environmental impact, and material performance. This article discusses the benefits and disadvantages of the main utility pole materials available. By considering the full lifecycle costs and environmental impacts, utilities can make informed decisions that align with both economic and ecological goals
Ready to Get in Touch?
Polesaver manufactures and supplies guaranteed products that are proven to maximise utility pole lifespan. With millions of Rot-Guard™ sleeves supplied to date, our patented ground-line barrier sleeves have been proven in volume use since 1994.
Contact Us
Connect With Us
Copyright © 2025 Polesaver. All rights Reserved.

*Polesaver uses long term independent test data on the effectiveness of barrier sleeves and fire protection fabric to reach all the conclusions given on this website (test data available on request). Based on this data, Polesaver believes longer life, maintenance of strength over time, improved safety and reliability, extended inspection periods and reduced maintenance requirements are reasonable claims. This is subject to Polesaver products being correctly applied as per our instructions and used on correctly preservative treated (for long term in-ground use - Use Class 4 or higher) wooden utility poles that are free of decay at the time of sleeve application. The claims made, real or implied are not warranties. It is the responsibility of the user to evaluate and satisfy themselves that the performance of the product meets their specific safety, reliability, extended inspection, repair and any other performance or cost-benefit criteria before using Polesaver sleeves or fire protection fabric.
crossmenuarrow-right