Covid-19: We are manufacturing, working and supplying as normal in-line with government guidelines
Historically, power and telecom poles used to support overhead power and telephone lines have been made from wood. Wood is readily available all over the world, lightweight, strong, non-conducting and durable when treated with preservative.
Recent changes in legislation affecting wood preservatives have shortened lifespan in tropical locations and have led many utilities to look at longer-lasting alternatives. Alternative pole materials include reinforced concrete, galvanised steel and composites.
So, do these materials give a longer lifespan than wooden poles? We take a look at each alternative to see how they compare.
We can see that all materials have different failure modes. This means a regular inspection is required after the first 10 to 15 years in service if pole failure is to be avoided with replacement.
For any utility company, lifetime cost is the key deciding factor when looking at alternative pole materials. This cost is generally calculated based on initial cost and projected lifespan for a given material.
The challenge is in knowing the lifespan for poles made from each of the different materials. This is where things become more challenging with a lack of published data offset by manufacturers claims for lifespan.
A study undertaken in Australia gives data on expected lifespan based on real-life experience over many years. The graph below shows the results:
Source: Pole Service Life – An Analysis of Country Energy Data (Australia)Nathan Spencer Koppers Wood Products Pty. Ltd., Sydney, Australia (Contact: email@example.com) Leith Elder Country Energy, Goulburn, Australia (Contact: firstname.lastname@example.org)
In concrete poles, the typical failure mode is corrosion of the reinforcing bars. For steel poles, ground line corrosion is common over time and for wood, ground-line decay and termite attack are the common failure modes.
As we can see, the results clearly show that standard treated wooden poles whilst generally outperforming concrete, lag behind steel poles. But when taking account of the initial cost, it is clear that wood is still a good all-round choice.
It is readily available, low in cost, lightweight, easy to handle and available in a wide range of sizes to suit all needs.
In the last 20 years there has been a growing adoption and use of technology to overcome woods greatest weakness; decay and termite attack. This happens at the vulnerable ground line section of the pole. It is at this part of the pole that conditions are perfect for wood decay and termite attack. In contrast, the section of pole deeper in the ground and above ground often have a service life 3 or 4 times longer than the ground line section.
So, to prevent degradation and failure at this point, composite, heat applied sleeve products such as Polesaver offer an excellent solution. They isolate the wood from all the factors necessary for ground rot and termite attack, including moisture and fungi. This results in dramatically extending the utility pole life at low unit cost. With a typical expected pole service life similar to that of steel poles, the use of ground line sleeves has given wood another lease of life as the material of choice for utility poles.
*Source Conclusions and Summary Report on an Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Utility Poles Prepared by: AquAeTer, Inc
Richard is the founder and CEO of Polesaver. With over 26 years of experience in developing and testing Polesaver products, Richard is an expert when it comes to wood preservation.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.
Polesaver manufacturers and supplies guaranteed products that are proven to extend the life of utility poles. With over 7 million sleeves supplied to date, our patented ground-line barrier sleeves have been proven in volume use since 1994.
+44 (0) 1452 688094
Unit 7, The Hawthorns, Staunton, Gloucestershire, GL19 3NY, UK
*Polesaver uses long term independent test data on the effectiveness of barrier sleeves and fire protection fabric to reach all the conclusions given on this website (test data available on request). Based on this data, Polesaver believes longer life, maintenance of strength over time, improved safety and reliability, extended inspection periods and reduced maintenance requirements are reasonable claims. This is subject to Polesaver products being correctly applied as per our instructions and used on correctly preservative treated (for long term in-ground use - use class 4 or higher) wooden utility poles that are free of decay at the time of sleeve application. The claims made, real or implied are not warranties. It is the responsibility of the user to evaluate and satisfy themselves that the performance of the product meets their specific safety, reliability, extended inspection, repair and any other performance or cost-benefit criteria before using Polesaver sleeves or fire protection fabric.