October 28, 2024
3 Minute Read

Polesaver: Proven Pole Protection Shouldn’t Cost the Earth

Wood Poles protected with Polesaver and Water Based Copper are the most adaptable, mobile, cost-effective & eco-friendly for utilities.

Recent global geo-political events have led to an increase in material costs, and more frequent severe weather events are inflicting more damage than ever on infrastructure. Utilities are not only seeking materials which provide long-term guarantees for long-lifecycle assets, they’re also carefully weighing up the monetary and environmental cost of these.

The restrictions placed on the use of creosote and CCA in ground contact, has led chemical manufacturers to develop new preservatives. Copper in oil solutions may offer an enhanced desired service life over water based copper, but this extended lifespan comes with additional costs which are felt throughout the supply chain.

To treat poles with copper in oil preservatives, pole producers need to invest in expensive new treatment plants. Each treatment requires a larger volume of preservative, at a higher unit cost, than water based copper. These higher capital and operating costs must be passed on, leading to significantly higher prices for customers.

In the absence of a non-creosote preservative that provides similar performance at a similar cost, pole users need to look elsewhere for a solution. That solution comes in the form of an effective ground-line barrier sleeve which offers an affordable and long lifespan for wood used in ground contact.

Polesaver’s engineer designed Rot-Guard™, dual-layer, full barrier sleeve, protects the critical ground-line section of the pole against rot, by keeping out moisture and wood eating fungus, maintaining pole strength and extending service by 20 years. Rot-Guard™ sleeves are compatible with all wood and preservative types, but combining them with a water based copper preservative provides cost-effective superior protection, offering an initial saving of 23% and a lifetime cost saving of 48%, compared to copper in oil treated poles without sleeves.

Polesaver Comparison Graphic
  • 48% cost saving compared to copper in oil over the pole’s lifespan
  • Service life comparable with creosote (based on independent testing)
  • Environmental compliance for use in sensitive areas
  • Locks in preservatives and reduces leaching by up to 95%
  • No future restrictions on use; unaffected by licensing changes
  • No required upgrades to existing production processes

Whist the changes in wood preservation have understandably caused concern among producers and utilities, when protected correctly, wood remains the most adaptable, mobile, cost-effective and eco-friendly pole material. In comparison to steel and concrete, wood offers the most environmentally sound option for production and longevity. 

Contact Polesaver for an accurate and detailed cost calculation of how much your network could save. 

Polesaver has been dedicated to extending the life of wooden poles for over 30 years, and is used in over 30 countries worldwide.  Get in touch to speak to one of our team, or schedule a TEAMS call for you and your staff for more information.

LEARN MORE

TOTAL POLE PROTECTION

From durable fire fabric, to outstanding protection against rot and termites, Polesaver products are tested and trusted to deliver unbeatable pole protection.
Share

FEATURED Articles

Featured
May 16, 2022

What Are The Alternatives To Penta wood Preservative?

In this short article, we run through the alternatives to Pentachlorophenol wood preservative and how you can use them in conjunction with a full barrier system to prevent decay and increase pole life by +20 years from the start.
Image showing core rot in a wooden utility pole
Featured
October 15, 2019

Utility Pole Core Rot: Causes and Prevention

Core rot is the decay of the strongest part of a wooden utility pole, the core. It typically accounts for around 60 to 70% of wooden pole failures and can occur at any time during in the utility poles life. Core rot normally occurs due to air or insect-borne brown rot fungal spores entering the unprotected core of the pole through cracks
Utility Pole Materials: Which Is Best? - Hero Image of utility pole stood up in a field
Featured
July 9, 2019

Utility Pole Materials: Which Is the Best Choice for Longevity and Sustainability?

The choice of which utility pole to use depends on balancing cost, environmental impact, and material performance. This article discusses the benefits and disadvantages of the main utility pole materials available. By considering the full lifecycle costs and environmental impacts, utilities can make informed decisions that align with both economic and ecological goals
Ready to Get in Touch?
Polesaver manufactures and supplies guaranteed products that are proven to maximise utility pole lifespan. With millions of Rot-Guard™ sleeves supplied to date, our patented ground-line barrier sleeves have been proven in volume use since 1994.
Contact Us
Connect With Us
Copyright © 2025 Polesaver. All rights Reserved.

*Polesaver uses long term independent test data on the effectiveness of barrier sleeves and fire protection fabric to reach all the conclusions given on this website (test data available on request). Based on this data, Polesaver believes longer life, maintenance of strength over time, improved safety and reliability, extended inspection periods and reduced maintenance requirements are reasonable claims. This is subject to Polesaver products being correctly applied as per our instructions and used on correctly preservative treated (for long term in-ground use - Use Class 4 or higher) wooden utility poles that are free of decay at the time of sleeve application. The claims made, real or implied are not warranties. It is the responsibility of the user to evaluate and satisfy themselves that the performance of the product meets their specific safety, reliability, extended inspection, repair and any other performance or cost-benefit criteria before using Polesaver sleeves or fire protection fabric.
crossmenuarrow-right